Amanda Prestigiacomo

A fourth female juror who served in the Lindsay Clancy trial has admitted that her decision to find the defendant not guilty by reason of insanity was rooted in her desire for Clancy to get mental health help, not necessarily the evidence presented in the case.“Originally, I felt as though she was guilty and she was criminally responsible for it, and maybe I still believe that in a certain way,” the female juror told CBS Boston. “I think that this was a woman who, you know, was not mentally healthy. She was someone that was in the throes of a significant mental health crisis, so I really just felt like she was so deep in it that she couldn’t see her way out. And so this was the only option.”Further explaining her decision to vote not guilty, the juror said that she thought justice for the Clancy family, including the three murdered children, would look like Clancy getting mental health services, which the juror said are not available in prison.“At the end of the day, there was so much doubt … there’s too much grey area,” she said. “And eventually I felt like the only way to get justice for Cora, Dawson, and Callan and Patrick and her parents and everyone that was closest to her, was to get her the help that she desperately needed, and there’s no way she’s getting that help in a prison.”Elsewhere in the interview, the woman rebuffed conspiracy theories online that claim Patrick Clancy, the defendant’s ex-husband, had something to do with the murders of the children.“I will never be the same after that 911 call,” the juror said. “After the trial, I saw all the conspiracy theories about how Patrick did it and he somehow convinced Lindsay that she did it when it was really him. And all I could think was that, if these people could have heard that visceral, blood-curdling scream … I will never be the same after that. It was horrifying.”Clancy, who has admitted to killing her three young children by strangling them with exercise bands on January 24, 2023, used an insanity defense to try to evade criminal liability in the triple-murder trial. The trial ended in a mistrial after the jury deadlocked following days of deliberations. According to female jurors on the trial, this was due to a lone male juror who refused to agree that Clancy was not guilty by reason of insanity.As highlighted by The Daily Wire, remarks from three other female jurors are turning heads too. For example, one juror told News 10 Boston that the holdout juror on the case was “arrogant” and said he would not listen to the female nurses on the panel who gave him information about a toxicology report presented in evidence. “They spoke to that specific thing, the question that he had [about the toxicology report] — he just completely disregarded the information that they gave.”CEO and co-founder of The Federalist Sean Davis said the remarks exposed “something of a major bombshell.”“One of the jurors admits that multiple nurses on the jury used their experience and medical background to ‘explain’ toxicology reports to the holdout juror,” Davis wrote on X. “I showed that clip to a trial attorney who immediately saw it as an admission that the pro-Clancy jurors were using outside information and evidence from outside the trial process to bully a juror toward a particular outcome.”Another attention-grabbing moment was when the female foreperson admitted that she rushed to sign a not-guilty by insanity verdict when she claims the lone holdout juror expressed reasonable doubt. The male juror has not shared his side of events, but he appears to have rushed to stop her before she submitted the verdict.Others online noted their concern about the female jurors’ admissions about how charmed they were by Clancy’s defense attorney Kevin Reddington and their description of the state being too “harsh” with Clancy.Related: The Hidden ‘Bombshell’ Female Lindsay Clancy Jurors Just Exposed

Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney has finally publicly rejected the nasty TikTok conspiracies targeting her former husband, Patrick Clancy.

Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney has finally publicly rejected the nasty TikTok conspiracies targeting her former husband, Patrick Clancy.During a Wednesday appearance on “CBS Mornings,” Kevin Reddington was again asked about speculation accusing the grieving father of involvement in the deaths of his three children. Unlike his softer response after Lindsay’s mistrial, Reddington directly denounced the claims as false and harmful.“Stop with the speculation and horrific conspiracy allegations” that Patrick was involved in “some massive conspiracy to kill his children,” Reddington said.“It’s horrific what this man has been going through and he’s entitled to move on with his life,” he continued. “It’s obvious that Patrick was a man who stood by his wife through all of the difficulty of the medical issues, the psychiatric issues, the pharmaceutical issues, and even up to the time of the trial and even after the trial.”The conspiracies targeting Patrick have persisted online despite Lindsay acknowledging that she killed the couple’s three children. Her defense argued that she was suffering from postpartum psychosis and was not criminally responsible. Her murder trial ended in a mistrial after the jury deadlocked.Patrick’s attorney, Howard Cooper of Todd & Weld, put influencers, celebrities, and other social-media personalities “on notice” Tuesday, warning that Patrick and his family are prepared to pursue legal action over defamatory claims about Patrick’s supposed involvement in the children’s deaths.Cooper said the family has been forced to endure “relentless, escalating, and destructive defamation” as well as “outright falsehoods” and warned that those spreading such claims could face legal consequences.Reddington’s comments Wednesday were notably much less dismissive than when he addressed the conspiracies previously. In an interview following the mistrial, for example, he said he did not “dismiss” people on TikTok and Instagram who were looking into the case, adding that it was “amazing” how they were able to “ferret out facts” and conduct their own “investigations.”In a 911 call made by Patrick, which was referenced by Reddington on Wednesday, the father first speaks with a dispatcher after finding Lindsay on the ground outside their home following her suicide attempt. While on the phone, he then discovers the bodies of his three children in their basement. “Oh my God!” Patrick says on the call, according to reporters in the courtroom. “She killed the kids!”The judge in the case granted Patrick’s request to allow only the audio of the call to be played in the courtroom, barring wider release.Related: The Hidden ‘Bombshell’ Female Lindsay Clancy Jurors Just Exposed

The holdout juror who refused to agree that Lindsay Clancy was not guilty of murdering her children by reason of insanity was a black man, the lone minority on the panel.

President Donald Trump on Sunday rejected the request from Lindsay Clancy's defense attorney to get involved in the case or pardon his client, who has admitted to killing her three young children.

New details are emerging about the death of actress Hayden Panettiere, with law enforcement sources reportedly telling TMZ that she took a single pill that may have been laced with fentanyl before she died.

A juror who served on the closely watched Lindsay Clancy triple-murder trial has admitted that she came into the trial with a political agenda, namely to set a precedent that could, in her view, help future mothers.

President Donald Trump on Sunday rejected the request from Lindsay Clancy’s defense attorney to get involved in the case or pardon his client, who has admitted to killing her three young children.While the president framed the case as a tragedy and Kevin Reddington as a good lawyer, Trump noted that Clancy is facing state charges, suggesting he couldn’t intervene even if he wanted to.“It’s a very sad situation. … There is no winner there — there’s no win no matter what you do; three children are dead,” Trump told the press. “It’s actually a state situation, not a federal.”The reporter followed up by telling Trump that Reddington wanted the president to pressure the state prosecutor. “Would you do that?” he asked.“I hope they can work it out, that’s something they have to work out,” Trump responded. “There is no win there.”Reddington called on Trump to pardon Clancy after a mistrial was declared earlier this month. The jury deliberated for days, but ultimately, a lone juror refused to agree that Clancy was not guilty by reason of insanity in killings, according to fellow jurors.Reddington’s appeal seemed to be strategic and not actually practical, since Clancy is facing state charges for killing her three children, not federal charges. When he was pressed about the discrepancy, he suggested Trump should pressure the state prosecutor on the case.“Trump would be able to reach out to one of his Department of Justice people, … maybe talk to [District Attorney] Tim Cruz, and maybe bring some pressure,” Reddington said.“But why do you want to encourage the president of the United States to pressure a local DA on a state prosecution?” he was pressed on NBC, to which he responded, “I don’t care if Mahatma Gandhi came down and pressured him into doing something, because I do not believe that this is … a righteous prosecution.”“You called on President Trump to offer your client a pardon when he cannot pardon state crimes. Why did you do that?”REDDINGTON: “Trump would be able to reach out to one of his DOJ people, maybe talk to Tim Cruz and maybe bring some pressure.”“But why do you want to… pic.twitter/Bf6d2dD3ha— Daily Wire (@realDailyWire) September 9, 2026It’s unclear if Clancy will be retried for her crimes, as that decision is up to the state.Related: Lindsay Clancy’s Lawyer Turns To Trump With Request

A Chinese billionaire who has reportedly fathered more than 100 children through American surrogates is raising more concern about the limits of