Andrew C. Mccarthy

Fidelity to the judicial role constrains them from insinuating that the president will abuse his power — but if he does, they will respond decisively.

Over the last few years, I've several times addressed a problem with no satisfying answer: what to do about terrorists who should be executed for

Supporting a stable world order that promotes the rule of law has made the U.S. the most prosperous nation in history. Trump has little time for that.

The fact that intelligence leaks may embarrass the president is not a reason to refrain from investigating them.

Given Trump’s tirades about Chávez’s theft of American property, it’s worth spotlighting the cynicism.

Undermining the rule of law and a relatively free market will have long-term ramifications.

Over the holiday weekend, we ran my three-part series on President Trump's de facto seizure from Venezuela of oil reserves that, putatively, would well more than double American reserves.

Over the course of eight years, from the bombing of the World Trade Center on February 26, 1993, through the destruction of that iconic American complex on September 11, 2001—in suicide hijackings that killed nearly 3,000 Americans, struck the Pentagon, and would have obliterated a target in the U.S. capital, probably the Capitol itself, were it not for the heroism of Flight 93's doomed passengers and crew—jihadist terrorists repeatedly attacked American installations at home and overseas.

Sharia supremacism is on the march, still.

I've been following Dan's analyses of the litigation involving President Trump's attempt to use the Post Office's limited and basically ministerial