David Harsanyi is a columnist at the Washington Examiner. He covers a range of topics including politics, government, elections, and public policy, with a focus on current affairs and international relations. David's work has been featured in numerous outlets, including Yahoo News, The Detroit News, and National Review, among others.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
David Harsanyi predominantly covers government and politics, with a focus on legal policy regulation and opinion editorials. He frequently addresses topics related to US government officials such as Joe Biden and Clarence Thomas.
Given his coverage attributes, David would likely be receptive to pitches from experts in law or political science who can contribute insightful commentary on legal and policy matters concerning US government figures. Additionally, he may also consider contributions from individuals with unique perspectives on cultural and societal issues intersecting with politics.
Since his geographic focus is the United States, pitches should be tailored to reflect their relevance within the country's political landscape.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
Do the math, Zo: The United States spends immense amounts of money feeding and caring for the poor — far more than it does on war.
By David Harsanyi The other day, New York Mayor Zohran Mamdani told Qatari state media that the United States was “spending tens of billions
In Focus delivers deeper coverage of the political, cultural, and ideological issues shaping America.
By: David Harsanyi
National defense comprises around 13 percent of the federal budget, far less than the primary drivers of debt, Social Security and Medicare.
Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon caused a big stir this week after quitting his job over fears that artificial intelligence may lead to the end of humanity.
Vice President JD Vance's proposed expansion of a childcare subsidy for stay-at-home parents is an economic-populist dead end.
It was probably inevitable that the Right's economic populism would degenerate into promises of more government checks.
Once you normalize arguments in favor of dependency, politics devolves into an arms race in who can send voters bigger checks.
By: David Harsanyi
Last week, the Trump administration floated the idea of redirecting federal child-care aid so low-income married stay-at-home parents could get a $9,000 subsidy per child for day care.
By David Harsanyi It was probably inevitable that the Right's economic populism would degenerate into promises of more government checks.
