Ian Millhiser is a Senior Correspondent at Vox. He specializes in law and legal affairs, with a focus on litigation, civil and family law, and general assignment news related to government and politics. Ian's insights and analyses have been featured in numerous outlets, including RealClearPolitics, Above the Law, and Yahoo News.
Preston is the artificial intelligence that powers the Intelligent Relations PR platform. Meet Preston
United States (National)
Not enough data
Ian Millhiser's area of focus is legal policy regulation, particularly concerning the Supreme Court and its impact on various social issues. His coverage leans heavily towards government and politics, with a focus on specific topics such as abortion rights, LGBTQ rights, conservative court decisions, and billionaire influence.
To effectively reach out to Ian Millhiser, consider providing insights or commentary from experts in constitutional law or legal scholars who can offer nuanced perspectives on Supreme Court rulings and their broader implications for society. Additionally, individuals with expertise in civil rights law or political science may also be valuable sources for his articles.
Given that Ian's geographic focus is national (United States), pitches should highlight how the proposed content directly relates to U.S. legal policy matters and potentially influences broader societal dynamics within the country.
This information evolves through artificial intelligence and human feedback. Improve this profile .
For a brief moment late last week, it looked like acting Attorney General Todd Blanche's bid to get the word “acting” removed from his job title
Trump's lawyers make arguments that, if accepted by the justices, would render a wide range of laws unenforceable.
By: Ian Millhiser
Earlier this month, President Donald Trump issued a new executive order that purports to strip citizenship from some Americans.
By: Ian Millhiser
No one knows what the Constitution's 26th Amendment means. On Tuesday, a federal appeals court struck down a South Carolina law that permits
The bizarre, but temporary, new voting rights decision, explained.
In March, President Donald Trump issued a blatantly illegal executive order claiming that he had the power to unilaterally rewrite US election law.
This completely unnecessary showdown was brought to you by an incompetent Supreme Court.
By: Ian Millhiser
Their opinion highlights two of the most troubling things about the current Supreme Court: its reluctance to impose limits on Trump's imperial-style presidency, and the frequent incoherence of its reasoning.
What the hell is going on with Missouri's congressional election?
By: Ian Millhiser
For the second time this week, the Court rules against Missouri's Republican gerrymander.
